Sheet Metal Nesting: Optimizing Layouts for Metal Fabrication
Sheet metal nesting is the practice of arranging parts on a metal plate or sheet so the cuts leave as little scrap as possible. For a woodworker or maker cutting rectangular parts - brackets, plates, covers, base panels, gussets - the math is the same bin-packing problem you already solve on plywood: fit the pieces, respect the kerf, count the sheets. CutPlan handles both sides of that problem: rectangular parts go through a panel optimizer, and drawn or SVG-imported outlines are nested by their real shape. What it does not do is CAM: it gives you the layout and the cut list, not toolpaths. This guide draws that line honestly, gives you the metal-specific numbers to plug in, and shows a worked example so you can see where the optimizer earns its keep and where you still need dedicated CAM software.
If you have never run a layout before, start with the complete guide to cut list optimization for the fundamentals, then come back here for the metal-specific adjustments.
Two kinds of nesting, and which one you actually have
The word "nesting" covers two very different problems, and picking the wrong tool wastes either money or material.
Rectangular nesting treats every part as its bounding rectangle and packs those rectangles onto the sheet. This is exactly what a panel-cutting optimizer does. It suits any part whose outline is a rectangle, or whose rectangular blank you will later drill, notch, or fold. A surprising share of fabrication work is rectangular: electrical enclosure panels, machine guards, shelf plates, mounting brackets, hearth plates, and the flat blanks for folded boxes all start life as rectangles.
True-shape nesting (also called contour or freeform nesting) packs the real outlines together at a range of rotations, tucking one part's concave notch around another part's bump. On a job full of L-shapes, discs, triangles, or organic brackets, true-shape nesting can lift material yield by 10 to 25 percent over a rectangular layout, because all the space a bounding box wastes becomes usable. Until recently this needed CAD geometry and paid CAM software; CutPlan now does it for outlines you draw or import as SVG, while DXF/DWG import and toolpaths still belong to CAM.
A quick test: if you can write your parts as a list of "width x height x quantity," rectangular nesting will serve you. If your parts only make sense as drawn outlines, draw them in the piece editor or import an SVG and CutPlan nests them by their real shape, in 90-degree steps, next to the rectangles. What stays outside the tool is the machine side: DXF or DWG import of CAD drawings, and toolpaths with lead-ins and tabs. That still belongs to CAM, and the rest of this post is about the rectangular job, which is where most of the saving on metal comes from.
What changes when the material is metal, not plywood
The packing algorithm does not care whether it is arranging oak or aluminum. But four practical inputs change, and getting them wrong is what makes a layout fail on the shop floor.
- Kerf depends on the process, not a blade. A saw has one kerf. Metal cutting has a wide range depending on how you sever the material, and the value you enter directly resizes every part. Guessing here is the most common mistake, covered in the table below and in our kerf explainer.
- Rotation is usually free. Wood has grain, so panels often lock to one orientation. Most metal has no directional structure, so you can let the optimizer rotate parts 90 degrees at will, which typically buys 5 to 12 percent tighter packing. The exceptions are brushed, grained, or directionally patterned finishes on stainless and anodized aluminum: treat those exactly like wood grain and keep orientation fixed.
- Heat needs breathing room. Plasma and laser cutting dump heat into the sheet. On thin gauge (under 3mm) parts crowded together can warp or the second cut can distort the first. Adding 1 to 3mm of part spacing beyond the kerf keeps the heat-affected zone of one edge away from its neighbor. Waterjet is cold-cutting and needs no thermal gap.
- The clamp or grip zone is off-limits. Whatever holds the sheet during cutting cannot have parts under it. On a CNC bed that is often 10 to 25mm along the gripped edges. Enter it as edge trim so the optimizer never places a part where the machine cannot reach.
Kerf by cutting method (enter this, do not guess)
Kerf is the width of material the cut removes. Set it too low and finished parts come out oversized and jam against each other; set it too high and you waste stock and may misreport how many sheets you need. These are typical working ranges - always confirm against your own machine and a test cut.
| Method | Typical kerf | Thermal spacing | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiber laser | 0.2 - 0.5 mm | 1 - 2 mm | Tightest kerf; excellent on thin steel and aluminum |
| CO2 laser | 0.3 - 0.8 mm | 1 - 2 mm | Wider on thicker plate; good edge quality |
| Waterjet | 1.0 - 2.0 mm | 0 mm (cold cut) | No heat distortion; kerf grows with abrasive nozzle wear |
| Plasma | 2.0 - 4.0 mm | 2 - 3 mm | Widest kerf; needs corner clearance for the torch to turn |
| Cold saw / bandsaw | 1.5 - 3.0 mm | 0 mm | For bar and profile, not sheet; behaves like a wood saw kerf |
Two nuances the table cannot capture. First, kerf usually widens as material gets thicker, so a 2mm plasma kerf on 3mm steel may open to 3.5mm on 20mm plate. Second, thermal kerf is not symmetric around the cut path, but for rectangular layout purposes entering the total kerf width is close enough. If your machine software already compensates the toolpath, enter a kerf of zero in the optimizer and let the machine own it, or you will double-count.
Standard metal sheet sizes to set as stock
Before packing anything, define your stock accurately. Ordering the right sheet size is often a bigger lever than the packing itself, the same way it is for wood - see the full standard sheet sizes guide.
- Mild steel: 2440 x 1220 mm (the 4x8 ft sheet) is the global default. 3000 x 1500 mm is equally common in Europe and Asia and nests larger parts more efficiently.
- Aluminum: 2440 x 1220 mm and 2500 x 1250 mm are the primary sizes, with wider specialty stock available.
- Stainless steel: mirrors mild steel at 2440 x 1220 mm and 3000 x 1500 mm. Because stainless runs 3 to 5 times the price of mild steel, every percent of yield matters more.
- Gauge: anything from 0.5 mm sheet up to 25 mm+ plate. Thicker plate is pricier and slower to cut, so the payoff from tight nesting climbs with thickness.
A worked example: 40 brackets from 6 mm mild steel
Numbers make the trade-offs concrete. Say you need 40 rectangular mounting plates in a mix of sizes, cut from 6 mm mild steel on a plasma table. Stock is 2440 x 1220 mm at roughly $120 per sheet. Your plasma kerf is 2.5 mm, you add 2 mm thermal spacing, and the bed grips 20 mm along two edges.
- Eyeballed manual layout: laying parts out by hand in neat rows, ignoring rotation, you fit the job on 7 sheets. That is $840 of steel with roughly 38 percent of it going to scrap and the drop bin.
- Rectangular optimizer, rotation on: letting the software rotate parts and mix sizes across each sheet, the same 40 parts drop onto 5 sheets. That is $600, about 14 percent scrap, and a $240 saving on one job.
- What rectangular packing cannot recover: if those plates had large corner cut-outs, drawing them as shapes and letting the optimizer nest the real outlines could interlock them onto 4 sheets. That last sheet of yield is only there when the geometry and the material price justify the extra drawing work.
Run that weekly and the rectangular optimization alone is over $12,000 a year in mild steel. Swap in stainless at $400+ a sheet and the same layout choice swings closer to $40,000. The point is not the exact figure, it is that the biggest, cheapest win - moving from eyeballed rows to an honest rectangular pack - is available for free before you draw a single outline. For the wider comparison of automated versus by-hand layout, see CNC nesting vs manual cut list.
Setting metal up in the optimizer, step by step
Here is the exact sequence to translate a metal job into CutPlan:
- Define stock first. Enter your real sheet size and, if you keep drops, add usable offcuts as extra stock — and tick "Prefer my saved offcuts", because by default the optimizer prices a drop like a fresh sheet and will not favour it.
- Set the clamp zone as edge trim. Trim the gripped edges (say 20 mm) so no part lands where the machine holds the sheet.
- Enter kerf from the table, or zero if the machine compensates. This is the single value most likely to bite you, so confirm it against a test cut.
- Add part spacing for thermal cutting. There is no separate spacing field, so fold it into the kerf: on plasma and laser enter kerf plus 1 to 3 mm as one number; on waterjet enter the kerf alone.
- Enable rotation unless the finish is directional. Turn it off only for brushed or grained stock.
- Review, then export. Sanity-check the layout, then send it on. For getting the geometry into a controller, our DXF export for CNC guide walks through file prep.
One honest limitation worth stating plainly: the optimizer outputs a packing plan, a cut list and a DXF of the layout, not a machine-ready toolpath with lead-ins, tabs, and pierce points. It tells you how many sheets and where each part sits. The controller or CAM step still owns the actual toolpath. That division of labor is fine for most rectangular jobs, and is why a free panel tool is enough to settle the sheet count and layout while the toolpath stays where it belongs.
Ready to Optimize Your Cut List?
Free, browser-based, no installation needed. Paste your parts and get an optimized layout in seconds.
Open Optimizer →Frequently Asked Questions
Can I use a wood panel optimizer for sheet metal?
Yes. Rectangular blanks go through the same bin-packing math as plywood; drawn or SVG-imported outlines are nested by shape. Set the kerf to match your cutting method rather than a saw blade, and for plasma or laser fold the thermal part spacing into that same kerf number, since there is no separate spacing field: enter kerf plus 1 to 3 mm as one figure, and on waterjet enter the kerf alone because a cold cut needs no thermal gap. Enable rotation unless the finish is directional, because most steel and aluminum has no grain to respect. Enter the clamp or grip zone as edge trim so no part is placed where the machine holds the sheet. What stays outside the tool is DXF or DWG import and machine toolpaths, which belong to CAM. For a job of mostly rectangular blanks, the panel tool settles the sheet count and layout.
What kerf should I enter for plasma, laser, or waterjet?
Start from the typical ranges in this article's table: fiber laser 0.2 to 0.5 mm, CO2 laser 0.3 to 0.8 mm, waterjet 1.0 to 2.0 mm, and plasma 2.0 to 4.0 mm. Two things the table cannot capture. First, kerf widens as material gets thicker, so a 2mm plasma kerf on 3mm steel may open to 3.5mm on 20mm plate, and waterjet kerf grows as the abrasive nozzle wears. Second, thermal cutting needs breathing room beyond the kerf, so on plasma and laser add 1 to 3 mm of spacing to the number you enter. Verify with a test cut on your own machine and material before trusting any published figure on a full run. If your CNC software already compensates the toolpath for the kerf, enter a kerf of zero in the optimizer so the width is not reserved twice, once in the layout and once at the controller.
Can the optimizer rotate metal parts to save material?
For most metal, yes, and it usually buys 5 to 12 percent tighter packing because plain steel and aluminum have no grain direction. Wood forces many parts into one orientation to keep the veneer running the right way, which leaves gaps the optimizer cannot fill. Metal has no such directional structure, so a part can be turned 90 degrees to slot into a leftover strip, and across a whole sheet those small turns add up to fewer sheets. The exception is directional finishes. Brushed or grained stainless, and anodized or patterned aluminum, show a visible direction on the finished part, so you should lock orientation for those exactly as you would for wood grain, and accept the slightly looser pack that comes with it. Plain mild steel that will be painted or powder-coated has no reason to be locked, so leave rotation on for everything that has no visible finish direction.
How much material can rectangular nesting actually save?
Moving from an eyeballed manual layout to an honest rectangular pack commonly cuts the sheet count, and the saving compounds with every repeat of the job. Manual layouts in neat rows ignore rotation and mixed sizes, so they leave strips of unused plate on every sheet; the optimizer rotates parts and mixes sizes across each sheet to fill those strips. In the worked example above, 40 mounting plates cut from 6 mm mild steel dropped from 7 sheets to 5 sheets. That is a $240 saving on one job, and a shop running that job weekly sees the rectangular optimization alone pass $12,000 a year in mild steel, closer to $40,000 in stainless because the sheet price is so much higher. On non-rectangular parts, drawing the outlines and nesting them by shape can recover more; the rectangular win still comes first and needs no drawing.